Jamila Lyiscottt in “3 ways to speak English” highlights the depths of how her different ways of speaking, effect’s people’s views of her. “But do not judge by my language and assume that I’m ignorant to teach cause I speak three tongues.” She correlates the idea of her “three tongues” to the idea of people assuming that because she has many ways of speaking English she is unable to teach in a professional setting. She highlights the idea of people having a predispose-notion of when you speak three English’s your non-intellectual. Jamila highlights the ways she speaks three different English’s and the languages as borrowed.She goes on to say “I know I had to borrow your language because mines was stolen from me,” she ties her different ways of speaking to the history of oppression and addresses that she chooses to treat each English as equals. She highlight’s how she chooses to carry history in the ways in which she speaks her accented English’s by stating “Cause I speak three tongues, one for each home,school, friends,” she goes on to say how she is able to to fluently address people in different settings. Her talk was based on how the English language should be multifaceted and articulation should not be based on one way of speaking.

Summary

Jamila Lyiscott the speaker of the “3 ways to speak English” explains how she speaks English with her friends, parents, and classmates should be known as articulate. For example when Lyiscott says “I’m articulate but who controls articulation? Because the English language is a multifaceted oration subject to indefinite transformation.” She is  letting us know that English is already a made up language as all languages are. when she says her languages are equal she is showing us that as long as she is understood it doesn’t matter of which 3 of her languages she speaks she is still articulate. Lyiscott proves this because  as she just said “english is a subject to indefinite transformation” she shows the English language is always changing and she is just speaking in a different form of English that has been modified with its own set of rules not a wrong form of English.

Jamila Lyiscott “3 ways to speak English” reflects on how speaking broken English does not make you less articulate. For example Lyiscott states “But do not judge me by my language and assume That I’m too ignorant to teach ‘Cause I speak three tongues One for each Home, school and canadian meds online friends I’m a tri-lingual orator”. Lyiscott believes speaking broken English actually makes her more articulate and will diversify her, since she can speak another tongue when in different environments.  Jamila also shows that articulate sounds different to other people, for example canadian pharmacy cialis she states “Now you may think that it is ignorant to speak broken English, But I’m here to tell you that even “articulate” Americans sound foolish to the British. So when my Professor comes on the block and says, “Hello” I stop him and say “Noooo …You’re being inarticulate … the proper way is to say ‘what’s good’”. Lyiscott explains how she can take her different languages and incorporate them in different parts of her life.

In Jamila Lysicott’s spoken-word video, she uses the different types of English she speaks to explain how articulate she is. She talks about each forms of English: the standard American English she speaks in the classroom, the Ebonics or “street talk” she speaks with her friends, and the broken English that she speaks with her family at home. She also challenges the idea that the only way to be articulate is to speak the standard English. She says, “yes, I have decided to treat all three of my languages as equals, because I’m articulate.” Jamila explains that she is articulate not only when she speaks Standard English, but also when she speaks broken English and “street talk” English.

In George Orwell’s article “Why I Write,” he explains how he became a writer. Being lonely at home sometimes, helped him to think of stories that motivated him to realize how he can use words to write. He plagiarized his fist poem, and later wrote a patriotic poem at the age of eleven. He continued to write, though incomplete short stories. At the age of sixteen he became interested in the sounds and association of words and that encourages him on what kinds of novels to write. He continues to enjoy using words to describe things then he wrote his first book.  He explains the four great motives of writing, and says that every writer views these four great motives differently depending on the atmosphere in which the writer is living. Orwell also reflects on his job in Burma that made him to understand the nature of imperialism, but was not enough to get him the political  experience he needs. He wrote a poem to express his feelings. The events  in 1936-37 made him understand and focus on what he wants to write about; “to make political writing into an art”. He intends to focus on writing about facts and that requires a personal experience; and that is why his book on Spanish civil war had a lot of newspaper quotations.

In Why I Write, George Orwell discusses that he includes his personal experiences in his writing to make it more distinctive. Orwell says that “I am not able, and do not want, to completely abandon the world view that I acquired in childhood” (p. 4). As long as he is a writer, Orwell will write about what he wants to expose to the reader. George Orwell’s writing is unique because of his style in writing. His writing is also unique when he includes his own character. “One can write nothing readable unless one constantly struggles to efface one’s own personality” (p. 4). When George writes politically he includes his own aesthetic into the entire experience. By doing so, George turns the writing into his own form of art. George Orwell has made it clear that he chooses to write politically in his own personal way to bring attention to his work.

In “3 ways to speak English” by Jamila Lyiscott, she expains how articulate she is by speaking three different languages. An example of this is when she’s talking to her friends “…when I’m on the block I switch it up just because I can, So when my boy says, “What’s good with you son?” I just say, “I jus’ fall out wit dem people but I done!”. She has managed to speak with her father at home and to the boys on the block a different way because she is articulate. This is telling us how Jamila understands everybody else and is able to be understood while she speaks other languages with her professor, friends and family at home. According to Jamila being articulate is when people tend to speak in different ways the same language with different people and being understood.

Three ways to speak English by Jamila Lyiscott argues that broken English should not be misunderstood for ignorance. Jamila Lyiscott (2014) argues that “speaking three tongues. One for each: Home, school and friends” shows her ability to respond fluently articulating herself with three languages. Jamila shows that despite providing a “broken English” response to a “proper English” question does not arise the assumption of ignorance. Jamila Lyiscott notes that despite most Americans speaking “proper English” it  sounds different perhaps foolish compared to British English. For example, “ even articulate Americans sound foolish to the British” which shows that  However, it’s not inarticulate or misunderstood for ignorance.  Jamila Lyiscott explains why broken English should not be treated as inarticulate language, because even broken English that is rules-based. Jamila Lyiscott explains that speaking “proper English” is not the only fundamental to be labeled articulate.