the article Against Empathy by Paul Bloom, argue about why empathy is not the only way to solve people’s issues. therefore, we should use another method such as cognitive empathy so that, instead of feeling what people feel or having compassion for others, we could face people’s problems and solves them without having the feeling or compassion. As he states in his article “emotional versus cognitive empathy. Bloom states that, people tend to misunderstand the real concept of empathy, it’s role, and how it can be viewed as an emotional thing. So by doing so,  people blend it with cognitive empathy which is fare away different from Empathy. In his article, he gives example that cover and support his argument. For instance, he gives an example of someone who is drowning in the river and how our first perception or idea is not to feel what this person is experiencing in the river water before we save him or her. But, rather what our moral sense or intuition will reveal to us in a lapse of time to save this person. Another example that shows his against empathy is that, in his article, he states that empathy is personal. We cannot empathize with the whole word at the same time and if empathy has to exist, it has to be individual. One example that illustrates this part is  when he talks about gun violence in Chicago and how people empathizes with the lost without knowing that thousand of murder are committed around the work at the moment.